Prehistoric Sigillaria tree (reconstruction),
Horsetail of today , Argentinosaurus huinculensis(please note the
man on the left). impact craters on the moon(Credit: NASA/LRO/LOLA/GSFC/MIT/Brown)
It is hard to understand that no one has outlined the following facts till
today. Only an
almost static description of our
solar system by physics science makes this
comprehensible. Since today’s physics assumes that solar energy
stems from fusion processes inside the sun, physics must assume an
almost static mass of
the sun in the time scale we are interested here. Similarly static must be
in this case the mass of earth, because otherwise the radius of earth’s orbit
would have varied considerably over the past. This is due to the
fact that the product of earth's mass and the mass of the sun directly determine
the radius of earth’s orbit around the sun in Newton’s gravitation formula.
Ever since astronomy is practised as a science, astronomers and geologists have
corrected their assumptions on earth striking meteorites and cosmic dust to a
higher level. In the
thirtieths of last century when physics agreed upon that the energy that heats
the sun stems from fusion processes in the sun the nature of the craters on the
moon was not known. Impacts of meteorites on earth were not investigated.
This assumption byphysicsleads to
the absurd fact, that other sciences -
such aspalaeontology(2) or
- are going round in circles since decades.
Today science assumes a total fall of
meteorites (inclusive cosmic dust) of 107-109kg per year.
This may seem a lot at the
but there is evidence that these numbers must get corrected further.Since
the sun is hit by a similar mass multiplied by the mass of the sun (332.000
means that nearly one fourths of earths mass has hit the sun in the last
4.5 billion years (this would equal the loss of mass through emmision) and on earth 4.5 * 1018 kg.
This well noted if todays assumptions are correct. But it is likely that earth has won in mass
also by another fact: bio-mass. Todays
common assumption is that the energy which the sun emits to earth is not
reflected in a win of mass. Maybe this does not
recognizes the fact that plants are able to convert a certain amount of this
energy into plant material.
archaeologist can tell you that you only have to dig into the earth to find
artefacts of previous centuries. In Geology there is a simple law that the
further you penetrate earth the older the sediments become. If this is not the
case a later disturbance must have occured. It is simple common
knowledge that coal sediments were formed deep down in earth and oil sediments are buried deep down in earth.
reason why it is not common knowledge that earth has won in mass by
extraterrestrial material since its
existance, is the fact that earths crust has been shifted, broke up, covered
by volcanic eruptions, has been subject to warping and faults. Wind, glacier,
erosion further complicate the picture...
There are many facts that
indicate a greater dynamic
and that the mass of earth has
grown in the last 100 million years
(Not to be confused with
the following description should be the aquatic environment
(walhes etc..). Totally different constrains reign here.)
the giant herbivore dinosaur species (sauropodes)
could not have existed in
today’s gravity conditions. If they wouldn't have been crushed by their own
mass, enormous forces would have been necessary to lift their neck or tail or
move. Every step on not rocky soil would have resulted in deep impresses. All
this would have resulted in a giant need for plant nutrition.
It is questionable that
this need could have been
it is extremely questionable thatflying dinosaurs (Pterosaur) with wingspans in excess of 10 meterscould ever have taken off from ground. The proposal that
they always climbed to higher locations to start flying is not reasonable
(they had extremely short legs).
The today postulated extinction of the dinosaurs by a single meteorite fall on
peninsula Yucatán (or some
volcanic eruptions or
reduced oxygen(which is semi-compatible to solar fusion energy theory)
is not able to explain this and all following facts.
"half-bird" ) is because of its weight (around40-100kg) not subsumed under the
early birds, but under Dromaeosaurides.
This although Unenlagia was extremely birdlike and feathered. The shoulder
girdle of Unenlagia shows adaptations for flapping, the arm bones show all
adaptions needed for flying and folding of the wings. In some aspects
Unenlagia is even more similar to modern birds than
today is considered as the most primitive bird and early ancestor of all
birds. (it is interesting to view
other bird like dinosaurs under this aspect! But also
the 5m long
Austroraptor Cabazai, weighing around 200 kg.
Is this an analogy to todays
It is inconceivable that under
todays gravitational conditions the giant dinosaur eggs could have been layed
without breaking. Drop height was too big with the sauropodes. The principal
problem that eggs must be hard enough to withstand the fall in laying but break easily in
hatching is not solvable.
A big enigma for science are
mating habits of Dinosaurs in general. If we think of giants with 100 tons or
(100.000 kg/50.000kg ) under todays gravity conditions, this enigma becomes unsolvable.
The incredibly heavy and in
some species more than 8m long neck was more than one time subject of
found air-sacs in the bones which reduce the weight by 10%. This reduces
the weight of the neck from 4.5 metric tons to 4.05 metric tons, which is still the weight
of an adult elefant.
The skulls of some dinosaurs
extended as much as one third of the body length and were up to 2.5 meters in
length. The extremely bony and heavy skulls were provided with a ball and
socket joint between the skull and the top of the backbone. Extending from the
base of the skull was a spherical ball of the size of a men's wrist (occipital
condyle). Even with strongest supporting muscles it is questionable that this
joint could stand the forces excerted under
todays gravitational conditions.
also in the world of insects and
flying insects giant species (e.g.
giant dragonflies with
wingspans of 75cm and more or giant flies ) dominated. It is totally
inconceivable that these flying insects had a chance to fly (and take off!) or to rest on water-plants under todays
gravity conditions. But also
the not flying giant insects of these times (e.g. giant
spiders or grasshoppers) are hard to conceive under todays
Since Darwin one of the biggest
questions in science and a not solvable enigma: how can it be that very diverging species started flying
in prehistoric times ? There are numerous hypothesis which all suffer from the fact that they
are inconceivable under todays gravitational conditions.
it should not be necessary to
mention the fact that there existed also small animals (e.g. predecessors of
mammals) and plants at this time. But
there must be a reason if giant species prevale at a certain time or in other
words, if these giant species are today extinct.
Especially can one single impact - or some few
impacts - not explain why in the world of plants today so many giant species are extinct or exist today
only as miniaturazations. Further did newer
investigations show that the different
are not so sharpely localized in time as previously thought.
The whole process of extinction of the
biggest land animals repeated in earths history, some examples: after the
dinosaurs some mammals (eg
during the Eocene to Oligocene orDeinotherium
from 65 million to 2.6 million years ago
or Titanotheriidaearound 56–34 million years ago) grew to a maximum size of 20to
and 17to resp. and up to 2.5 m in height, in Miozene
and Pliocene the Gomphotheriidae were up to 3m in hight,
thereafter Mammoths (from
Pliocene epoch to approx. 4,500 years ago) to a maximum size of
12to (compared to todays
Elephants with 7to)(5).
other indications for a warming up in the last 5000 years can
be seen in the north movement of advanced
human civilizations in the european-asian region: starting with Egypt,
Babylon, Persia with Persepolis as centre, over the Greeks
and Romans to the highly industrialized nations France, England,
north Italy). It is simply a question of the climate that
productivity is not that high in southern countries today. In the Americas a
similar north movement is to observe: Mayas, Aztecs with the USA as today’s
advanced civilization and in the southern
hemisphere the Incas in Peru and Equador.
Although this increase in temperature was surely not big, it is a temperature
range where mankind is sensitive.
many more indications exist for which todays science has no appropriate
explanations, e.g. petroglyphs in Sahara that show animals of
more moderate regions etc.
the ice-ages can not fully get
Milankovitch-cycles nor by CO2
variations. Although we are just beginning to understand some of the more
complicated interactions (gulf stream, El Nino, La Nina, methane-ice..) these effects
can not fully explain the extend of involved climat variations.
the moon constantly moves a
measurable distance away from earth
(3-4 cm/year), although moon and earth gain constantly
in mass. The only possible explanation for this you can read
Fossilized bones of a dinosaur
bigger than Argentinosaurus have been unearthed in
Argentina. Scientists believe it is a new species of
titanosaur. According to the
AFP report the chief of the palaeontologic
museum in Trelew, Ruben Cuneo, said that it was
40m (130ft) long and 20m (65ft) tall and did weigh more than 100
metric tons. This is as heavy as
20 African elephants. You can
visit the museum here,
which specifies the weight on his website to 80 metric tonnes.
Here you can read theBBCreport (the BBC as the scientific authority it surely is rejects the
weight estimation of the argentinian researchers. They have their own weight
estimation with 77 (metric) tonnes (watch the video!) But it seems the BBC
estimation is very questionable since
Argentinosaurus is already estimated in newer calculations as having 83 (60-88)
tonnes and ten percent more would mean at least 91 tonnes.). But: "The picture
is muddied by the various complicated methods for estimating size and weight,
based on skeletons that are usually incomplete". This one is
rather complete, dear BBC.) .
here: 1234567. (MEF)
Although billions of craters exist on the moon in
this video only craters that are
larger than 20 kilometers in diameter are mapped to colors.
Blue indicates low elevation, and red indicates high elevation on the lunar surface
(5,185 craters larger than 20km).(Video: NASA/LRO/LOLA/GSFC/MIT/Brown)
This description shell in no way comment, critisize or diminish the
conclusions and consequences of the actual global warming discussion. It shell
only express the oppinion of the author that todays description of our solar
system and the universe by physics is much too simplified.
(Many more on the
page to this subject. Please apologize that this is only an abstract but
there are so many technical terms in the german text that a translation is hard
to do. And use Google translate only if you're interested in word salad.)
Sorry, many of you search for a forum here. But since
maintaining a forum costs a lot of time and I haven't got this time you won't
find one here.
only as an example the maximum possible mass of birds
compare also this study of University of Calgary
published in Nov.2010: Science 26 November 2010, S 1216-1219: "The
Evolution of Maximum Body Size of Terrestrial Mammals"," Maximum mammal size
increased at the beginning of the Cenozoic, then leveled off after about 25
million years", Abstract here: